BIAFRA | Monday, 23.04.17 | 10:58pm
We Biafrans and Other Human Rights Activists Strongly Reject Importation Of Sharia Law In Kanu’s Trial
At this juncture, it is very pertinent to know what is Sharia code of conduct: Sharia is an Islamic Law. It is the religious legal system that governs the political, social and moral duties of faithful Muslims.
Kanu has never been a Muslim let alone a faithful one. He has in several occasions displayed the kind of religion that governs his life’s style and we haven't seen him mention Qur'an or hadith as principal guidelines to reckon on.
One might be forced to ask: "Which religion does Kanu belong to?" To answer this critical question clearly, he(Nnamdi Kanu, radio-Biafra director) did say it time without number and on a reiterative note during radio-Biafra programs that "Biafra is our religion and only the true-Supreme God, Chukwu Okike Abiama, do we worship here on radio-Biafra".
But in the foregoing, the federal government of Nigeria, in its persecution (instead of prosecution) of Nnamdi Kanu and an insisted push for a secret trial, has forced the federal judge, Binta Nyako, to develop some body language of smuggling sharia secret trial into the court's proceedings which is obviously alien to Nigeria's constitution as a secular state, in order to actualise the task of nailing Nnamdi Kanu.
It's on public domain that Binta Nyako posited that Nnamdi Kanu and co-accused counsels should acquaint themselves with what is obtainable in a sharia setting because she would be importing Sharia Secret Trial proceedings in the case between the Biafra Republic which Nnamdi Kanu represents and the Federal Republic of Nigeria which the DSS represents.
This judge handling Kanu’s case, Injustice Binta Nyako should as a matter of urgency jettison this Importation of Sharia into the court's proceedings unless she can make bold to tell the whole world that Nigeria is now officially an Islamic country endorsed by the people.
In a situation Nigeria is officially declared Islamic country, the Christians and non-Muslims can peacefully opt out from the union to allow sons and daughters of the caliphate to practice their Allah-given laws, hence no one would have the right to deprive Muslims of their inalienable rights to practice whatever kind of religious conducts that suit their beliefs.
Assuming Nigeria is an Islamic country, does Binta have the right to judge Kanu? Let's hear the opinions of some Islamic scholars:
“The majority of scholars are of the view that it is not permissible for a woman to be appointed as a judge, and if she is appointed, the one who appointed her is a sinner, and her appointment is invalid, her judgments carry no weight, no matter what ruling she passes. This is the view of the Maalikis, Shaafa’is, and Hanbalis, and of some of the Hanafis.”
Let's go to Qur'an itself, “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allaah has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend (to support them) from their means.” [al-Nisa’].
“So the men are the protectors and maintainers of women, in the sense that they are in charge of them. So the verse may be understood as meaning that women cannot be appointed in charge. Otherwise women would be the protectors and maintainers of men, which is the opposite of what the verse says”.
Because of the lust for Biafran oil, northern Muslims have in one way or the other through the guidance of British government violated the teachings of Prophet Muhammad (PBOH).
I haven't seen where a Muslim who is under control of caliphate is fighting to live with people they ascribed as infidels, committing all manner of human rights atrocities just to attach to infidels.
Should we call Nigerian Muslims fake ones? No, they're not. The same Quran 9:5 which advised Muslims to kill infidels who rejected Sharia Law is still the same Quran guiding other Islamic Jihadists and the ones in Nigeria.
Binta Nyako, you have seen your flaws, even if you assumed Nigeria to be Islamic caliphate, you have no right to judge Kanu.
Biafran leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu will be going to court on 25th of April, 2017 being tomorrow to continue the case between the federal government of Nigeria and Biafra Republic.
I want to sound it very clear to the ears of Injustice Binta Nyako, Muhammadu Buhari, Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), Northern Elders Forum (NEF), Northern Youth Forum (NYF), Northern leaders and its entire populace that Kanu is a leader of the emerging African most creative nation, Biafra, and we will not tolerate Sharia proceedings.
We have given it all in this struggle, our bloods have been shed with brutality, and we must reject Sharia trial with our last blood.
And to the British government, I just want to remind you of one man, Mahatma Gandhi. “Gandhi was the leader of the Indian independence movement in British-ruled India.
Employing non-violent civil disobedience, Gandhi led India to independence and inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world.
British neo-colonial masters, Kanu’s method of freedom fighting will either make or mar your image before the world, like Gandhi, Kanu has taken a peaceful revolution which has gathered the attention of the international community and human rights activists. The litmus test is ongoing, what will be the result is in pipeline.
If Gandhi didn't fight British oppressors to a standstill, by now, Indians would have been turned into a liquid in a higher temperature furnace or seen enlargement of Hitler concentration camp.
As a result of British oppression in India, Gandhi organized protests against the British. When the British found out, they set fire and killed 400 Indian men,
women, and children. It's in record that Gandhi's strategy of peaceful revolution was very smart.
“On April 23rd, 1930, British troops stormed Peshawar to suppress non-violent demonstrators who were protesting the arrest of Ghaffar Khan. As troops moved into the Bazaar, British armored cars drove into the square at high-speed, killing several people. The crowd, however, continued their non-violent protest, and offered to disperse if they could gather their dead and injured, and if the British left the square. The Brits refused to leave, and it was ordered for them to open fire with machine guns on the unarmed crowd.
Almost 400 were gunned down by British forces at the Qissa Khwani Bazaar”
We encourage other human rights organizations and those inspired by Gandhi's peaceful strategies to rise against British-Nigeria subjugation, oppression, human rights violations, war crimes, abductions, rape and Importation of Sharia code of conducts to a supposed secular state.
Like India, Biafra will emerge victorious from British-Nigeria suppression, and present sunset shall be sunrise.
Until Injustice Binta Nyako publicly declares Nigeria an Islamic State, Kanu’s Secret Trial is dead on arrival.
Written by Chinedu Solomon
Edited by Ogu Edozie Williams
Published by IPOB Writers
Twitter: @ipob_writers
We Biafrans and Other Human Rights Activists Strongly Reject Importation Of Sharia Law In Kanu’s Trial
At this juncture, it is very pertinent to know what is Sharia code of conduct: Sharia is an Islamic Law. It is the religious legal system that governs the political, social and moral duties of faithful Muslims.
Kanu has never been a Muslim let alone a faithful one. He has in several occasions displayed the kind of religion that governs his life’s style and we haven't seen him mention Qur'an or hadith as principal guidelines to reckon on.
One might be forced to ask: "Which religion does Kanu belong to?" To answer this critical question clearly, he(Nnamdi Kanu, radio-Biafra director) did say it time without number and on a reiterative note during radio-Biafra programs that "Biafra is our religion and only the true-Supreme God, Chukwu Okike Abiama, do we worship here on radio-Biafra".
But in the foregoing, the federal government of Nigeria, in its persecution (instead of prosecution) of Nnamdi Kanu and an insisted push for a secret trial, has forced the federal judge, Binta Nyako, to develop some body language of smuggling sharia secret trial into the court's proceedings which is obviously alien to Nigeria's constitution as a secular state, in order to actualise the task of nailing Nnamdi Kanu.
It's on public domain that Binta Nyako posited that Nnamdi Kanu and co-accused counsels should acquaint themselves with what is obtainable in a sharia setting because she would be importing Sharia Secret Trial proceedings in the case between the Biafra Republic which Nnamdi Kanu represents and the Federal Republic of Nigeria which the DSS represents.
This judge handling Kanu’s case, Injustice Binta Nyako should as a matter of urgency jettison this Importation of Sharia into the court's proceedings unless she can make bold to tell the whole world that Nigeria is now officially an Islamic country endorsed by the people.
In a situation Nigeria is officially declared Islamic country, the Christians and non-Muslims can peacefully opt out from the union to allow sons and daughters of the caliphate to practice their Allah-given laws, hence no one would have the right to deprive Muslims of their inalienable rights to practice whatever kind of religious conducts that suit their beliefs.
Assuming Nigeria is an Islamic country, does Binta have the right to judge Kanu? Let's hear the opinions of some Islamic scholars:
“The majority of scholars are of the view that it is not permissible for a woman to be appointed as a judge, and if she is appointed, the one who appointed her is a sinner, and her appointment is invalid, her judgments carry no weight, no matter what ruling she passes. This is the view of the Maalikis, Shaafa’is, and Hanbalis, and of some of the Hanafis.”
Let's go to Qur'an itself, “Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allaah has made one of them to excel the other, and because they spend (to support them) from their means.” [al-Nisa’].
“So the men are the protectors and maintainers of women, in the sense that they are in charge of them. So the verse may be understood as meaning that women cannot be appointed in charge. Otherwise women would be the protectors and maintainers of men, which is the opposite of what the verse says”.
Because of the lust for Biafran oil, northern Muslims have in one way or the other through the guidance of British government violated the teachings of Prophet Muhammad (PBOH).
I haven't seen where a Muslim who is under control of caliphate is fighting to live with people they ascribed as infidels, committing all manner of human rights atrocities just to attach to infidels.
Should we call Nigerian Muslims fake ones? No, they're not. The same Quran 9:5 which advised Muslims to kill infidels who rejected Sharia Law is still the same Quran guiding other Islamic Jihadists and the ones in Nigeria.
Binta Nyako, you have seen your flaws, even if you assumed Nigeria to be Islamic caliphate, you have no right to judge Kanu.
Biafran leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu will be going to court on 25th of April, 2017 being tomorrow to continue the case between the federal government of Nigeria and Biafra Republic.
I want to sound it very clear to the ears of Injustice Binta Nyako, Muhammadu Buhari, Arewa Consultative Forum (ACF), Northern Elders Forum (NEF), Northern Youth Forum (NYF), Northern leaders and its entire populace that Kanu is a leader of the emerging African most creative nation, Biafra, and we will not tolerate Sharia proceedings.
We have given it all in this struggle, our bloods have been shed with brutality, and we must reject Sharia trial with our last blood.
And to the British government, I just want to remind you of one man, Mahatma Gandhi. “Gandhi was the leader of the Indian independence movement in British-ruled India.
Employing non-violent civil disobedience, Gandhi led India to independence and inspired movements for civil rights and freedom across the world.
British neo-colonial masters, Kanu’s method of freedom fighting will either make or mar your image before the world, like Gandhi, Kanu has taken a peaceful revolution which has gathered the attention of the international community and human rights activists. The litmus test is ongoing, what will be the result is in pipeline.
If Gandhi didn't fight British oppressors to a standstill, by now, Indians would have been turned into a liquid in a higher temperature furnace or seen enlargement of Hitler concentration camp.
As a result of British oppression in India, Gandhi organized protests against the British. When the British found out, they set fire and killed 400 Indian men,
women, and children. It's in record that Gandhi's strategy of peaceful revolution was very smart.
“On April 23rd, 1930, British troops stormed Peshawar to suppress non-violent demonstrators who were protesting the arrest of Ghaffar Khan. As troops moved into the Bazaar, British armored cars drove into the square at high-speed, killing several people. The crowd, however, continued their non-violent protest, and offered to disperse if they could gather their dead and injured, and if the British left the square. The Brits refused to leave, and it was ordered for them to open fire with machine guns on the unarmed crowd.
Almost 400 were gunned down by British forces at the Qissa Khwani Bazaar”
We encourage other human rights organizations and those inspired by Gandhi's peaceful strategies to rise against British-Nigeria subjugation, oppression, human rights violations, war crimes, abductions, rape and Importation of Sharia code of conducts to a supposed secular state.
Like India, Biafra will emerge victorious from British-Nigeria suppression, and present sunset shall be sunrise.
Until Injustice Binta Nyako publicly declares Nigeria an Islamic State, Kanu’s Secret Trial is dead on arrival.
Written by Chinedu Solomon
Edited by Ogu Edozie Williams
Published by IPOB Writers
Twitter: @ipob_writers
0 comments so far,add yours