For Biafra
Choice Writers
Nigerian
President, Muhammadu Buhari, has very terrible image all over the world, and he
knows it. It is common knowledge everywhere, even within his family, which was
a reason his wife recently expressed fear that Nigerians may rise up against
her husband.
It was
therefore not a surprise that Buhari initiated several moves to launder his
image. One of those moves was the writing of his biography which he
commissioned one hungry foreigner by name John Paden, to write.
Pathetic
Paden took the job, and went to work with lies and half-truths fed him by
Buhari and his many sidekicks. When that book was eventually launched in Abuja,
Nigeria’s capital, what many who read it saw was a compilation of pernicious
lies without rationality or facts. That led them to conclude that the book was
nothing but junk, a fabrication to white-wash the Buhari’s stinking image in
the most fraudulent way.
One of the
observations of the book’s critics was that even when Paden tried to take on
serious issues for treatment, he would tactically gloss over them without
establishing any substance. Such was the case when he declared that “senior
figures in the political and military configuration in Nigeria committed
serious crimes and indulge in damning acts of corruption".
He refused
to go into details as to who committed what and where, because he most
certainly knew that Buhari was a chief culprit. Of course, he refused to tell
the world that Buhari was among the worst of them who should have been tried
for war crimes. Again, for anyone who is conversant with the events of
Biafra/Nigeria war, the book showed Paden as dishonest and his book
intellectual garbage. This is why for any intellectually-minded reader, the
book lacked intellectual stamina.
For anyone
who knows Muhammadu Buhari, he would wonder whether it was that blood-tasty,
and genocidist infantry soldier of 1967 to 1970 that Paden was writing about.
Without any shred of doubt, the real Buhari was one of the masterminds of the
killing of over five million Biafran children, women and the aged during the
1967-1970 war. Even before the war, he was part of the perpetrators of the
pogroms of 1966 – 1967.
None of
these featured in the white-washed biography; neither did Paden acknowledge
that the black-hearted terrorist leader, Buhari, overthrew a democratically
elected government of Shehu Shagari in 1983. He did not tell his readers that
the treasonable felon should have been in prison for atrocities, neither did he
write about the hardship he inflicted on the people through his totalitarian
rule after the overthrow. Paden did not write about Buhari’s one-sided
conviction of southern politicians with his military tribunals, while sparing
all the thieving Northerners that served in the same government.
The
biographer did not tell his readers the current threat to peace that his
principal Buhari posed in the abominable contraption called Nigeria by
releasing members of his killer squad, Boko Haram. A good example was the
release of Kabiru Sokoto who masterminded the Christmas Day bombing at St
Theresa Catholic Church that led to the dead of hundreds Christian worshipers
in Abuja.
Buhari’s
atrocities in the current dispensation are legion, and any biography that fails
to bring that in is a sham. Without mincing words, we declare John Paden’s so-called
Buhari biography a sham; and a poor attempt at a rotten image-whitewashing.
0 comments so far,add yours