"LIVES OF WITNESSES AGAINST KANU THREATENED" ACCORDING TO DPP

"LIVES OF WITNESSES AGAINST KANU THREATENED" ACCORDING TO DPP ; MEANS THEY'RE ALREADY KNOWN, WHY MASK THEM?

It is obvious that the Nigerian judicial system lacks logical approach in the handling of matters of public interest. One could imagine how such glamorous statement can be made by a lawyer acting on behalf of the federation called Nigeria. Could it be it was a half-baked idea, was it properly thought out?

Personally, i imagined why such poor logical argument would be coming from a so called learned man called into the Nigerian Bar Association. Another could wonder why a judge could make a U-turn about a decision he already affirmed. In other not to deviate from the subject of discussion proper, let's ask ourselves some questions.

Who are those witnesses?
How did the department of public prosecution know that there were threats coming to the witnesses against Kanu?
If actually the witnesses are being threatened it simply means that they were already known, this is common knowledge and fact.

I was to suggest some ideas to the DPP which is to tell the trial Judge Tsoho that the lives of the witnesses against kanu will be in grave danger if they witnessed without masks or from some form of public glare.

This would be thrown into the trash and won't see the light of the day in the court because it is mere allegation.

As a matter of security those threatening the witnesses are known by the witnesses and the FG's public prosecutor and should be brought to book.

Chuks writes for

IPOB WRITERS