Tsoho; the unreliable judge |
The ability of Justice John Tsoho of the Federal
High Court, Abuja, to adjudicate on the case between Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, Leader
of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) and Director of Radio Biafra, and Nigeria
government, is suspect. The world should beware of him.
I want to recall that one January 29, 2016, Justice
Tsoho refused to grant bail to Nnamdi Kanu citing the followings:
1. That Nnamdi Kanu is a threat to national
security.
2. That if released, Nnamdi might commit the same
offence again.
3. That there was a probability that Kanu might jump
bail because he possessed dual citizenship.
In essence, Tsoho declared a man guilty in case he
has not even tried. So how possible is it that such a man should be allowed to
adjudicate in a serious and high profile case that has to do with the freedom
of Biafra?
Kanu: the prisoner of conscience |
Now on February 19, 2016, Justice Tsoho ruled
against a secret trial for Nnamdi Kanu. But funny enough this same judge
reversed himself last Monday, March 7, without an appeal from the prosecutor.
And one will ask why then is the sudden U-turn on his previous ruling?
How then can Nigerians trust a judiciary with such a
judge, or a judicial system that such a man represents? Justice Tsoho is sure an
international embarrassment to the legal profession, and all lawyers and all
justices, and judicial workers in Nigeria should be hiding their faces in
shame.
Without appealing a court ruling, this judge changed
his mind thereby turning his previous ruling upside down without adherence to
the appeal process. For this reason, it will be safe to state that Biafrans do
not have any iota of trust in the capability of justice Tsoho to handle such a
high profile case.
His blatant disregard for rule of law and his
ability to judicious interpretation in this cast is suspect. Justice Tsoho is
dangerous because he is more like a prosecuting attorney rather than a Judge.
One can no longer be in doubt of the claims that
Justice Tsoho has been sent by Muhammadu Buhari with the mandate to jail Nnamdi
Kanu. This is a claim which states that his prize for the job is the chief
judge of the federal high court position, since he is next in line after the
upcoming retirement of the only two judges above him.
We therefor advise Justice John Tsoho to remove
himself from this case because he is obviously compromised and he naturally
lacks the integrity and moral trust to handle this case as an impartial judge.
Xylem Chukwubatista
For Biafra Choice Writers
0 comments so far,add yours