Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB)
|
– Nnamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, along with other agitators instituted a suit against the federal government calling their release
– The detention of the Biafra agitators has generated mixed reactions among Nigerians
It was about three days ago, that the former Niger Delta militant leaderAsari Dokubo, called on the government of President Muhammadu Buhari to freethe leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu.
The
leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra and Director of Radio Biafra, Nnamdi
Kanu, with two other agitators named David Nwawusi and Benjamin Madubugwu, went
to the Court of Appeal challenging their detention in what they called,
“strange procedure.” The three Biafra agitators are facing a six-count treason
charge. They asked the Federal High Court, sitting in Abuja, not to continue with
their trial, until the determination of their consolidated appeal.
The three
men said that Justice John Tsoho did not accept hearing the trial. He only
allowed the prosecution council to shield the identity of the eight witnesses,
that would testify in the case. Justice Tsoho at the same time, refused to
discharge and acquit the three men, citing the prayer under section 351(1) of
the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015.
The three agitators’ lawyer, Chief Chuks Muoma, SAN, opined
that the trial judge, Justice Tsoho, made some mistakes, “when having refused
the application for the witnesses of the prosecution to testified behind
screens, or masked,” on February 19, “suddenly varied the said order in the
ruling delivered on March 7, 2016, on a mere oral application by the
respondent.” They said this was on what was in tandem with the mere oral
application by the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), Mr. Mohammed Diri.
In the DPP’s submission, he said: “My lord this is because they are already
receiving threats from associates of the defendants that they will be dealt
with. The witnesses said they love their lives and requested that their
identities be shielded from people who are coming to witness the proceeding.”
0 comments so far,add yours